Non-Solicitation

A non-solicitation agreement that legally protects your interests

Protect your clients and your team when someone leaves. Bar a former employee or contractor from poaching customers or staff, with terms matched to your state's law. Free templates in PDF & Word.

★★★★★ 4.6 Trustpilot1,240,000+ created✓ No auto-renew traps

Who's agreeing not to solicit?

Tell us the relationship and state and we'll load the right form.

Free to start · about 6 minutes

The complete guide

What is a non-solicitation agreement?

A non-solicitation agreement bars someone, usually a departing employee or contractor, from soliciting a company's customers or employees for a set time after they leave. Unlike a non-compete, it doesn't stop them from working in the field or for a competitor; it just stops them from poaching the clients and staff they had access to.

Because it's narrower than a non-compete, a non-solicitation agreement is more likely to be enforced, but enforceability still varies by state. Some states (like California) sharply limit or void these restrictions; most others enforce them if the scope, duration, and definition of who's protected are reasonable and the employee got something of value in return.

When do you need one?

Below is a list of when you may need a non-solicitation agreement. Keep in mind that the list is not exhaustive and the ultimate arbiter is you. You decide if it’s necessary or not. That said, it cannot be enforced in all situations. 

  • An employee with client relationships is leaving and you want to protect those accounts

  • A contractor had access to your customer list or key staff

  • You're selling a business and want the seller not to poach the customers

  • Protecting your team from being recruited away by a departing manager

  • Adding solicitation protection without the heavier burden of a non-compete

  • A key hire in a relationship-driven business (sales, agencies, services)

What it should include

  • Parties, the company and the employee, contractor, or seller

  • Customer non-solicit, which clients are off-limits, and for how long

  • Employee non-solicit, a bar on recruiting the company's staff

  • Duration, a reasonable time period after departure

  • Scope, how 'solicit' is defined, and any geographic limit

  • Consideration, what the person received in return (job, pay, sale proceeds)

  • Signatures, the company's and the person's, dated

Non-solicitation vs. non-compete

A non-compete bars someone from working in your field or for a competitor; a non-solicitation only bars them from poaching your clients or staff. Because it's narrower and less restrictive of someone's livelihood, a non-solicitation is generally easier to enforce, and a smart fallback in states that limit non-competes.

States that limit these clauses

Enforceability varies. California broadly voids employee non-competes and limits non-solicitation; other states enforce reasonable non-solicitation terms. Because the rules differ sharply, use a state-specific form and confirm your state's current stance before relying on the agreement.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Making the duration or scope so broad a court won't enforce it

  • Not defining who counts as a protected 'customer' or 'employee'

  • Assuming it's enforceable everywhere, some states limit or void it

  • Providing no consideration for an existing employee's new promise

  • Confusing it with a non-compete (they protect different things)

  • Failing to update it when someone's role or client access changes

Step by step

How to set up a non-solicitation agreement (5 steps)

1

Define what you're protecting

Decide whether you're barring solicitation of customers, employees, or both, and identify them clearly.

2

Set a reasonable duration

Choose a time period that's defensible for your industry (often 6 months to 2 years). Overreaching invites a court to strike it.

3

Define 'solicit' precisely

Spell out what counts as soliciting, and add a geographic limit if relevant. Vague scope is a common reason these fail, so be as specific as reasonably possible.

4

Make sure there's consideration

The person must get something of value, a job offer, a raise, or sale proceeds, in exchange for the promise. Check your state's rule on what's required.

5

Sign under your state's rules

Both sides sign. Confirm your state enforces non-solicitation terms, a few limit or void them, before relying on it.

Non-solicitation enforceability by state

Non-solicitation terms are enforced more readily than non-competes, but the rules still vary by state. Customer non-solicits are widely upheld if reasonable; employee (anti-raiding) non-solicits are less settled. Each row states the overall posture, how customer and employee clauses are treated, and the governing authority. Free state-specific forms.

StateEnforceableCustomer non-solicitEmployee non-solicitGoverning authority
AlabamaYes, with limits (statute)Yes, if reasonableUnsettledAla. Code § 8-1-190
AlaskaYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledData Management, Inc. v. Greene (1988)
ArizonaYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledValley Medical Specialists v. Farber (1999)
ArkansasYes, if reasonable (statute)Yes, if reasonableCommon law (if reasonable)Ark. Code § 4-75-101
CaliforniaNo (void by statute)Trade-secret onlyLikely voidCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.5
ColoradoVery limited (wage thresholds)High earners onlyUnsettledColo. Rev. Stat. § 8-2-113
ConnecticutYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledScott v. General Iron & Welding Co. (1976)
DelawareYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledAll Pro Maids, Inc. v. Layton (2004)
FloridaYes (statute)Yes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableFla. Stat. § 542.335
GeorgiaYes, if reasonable (statute)Yes (no geography needed)Yes (needs time limit)O.C.G.A. § 13-8-53
HawaiiYes, with limits (tech carve-out)Yes, if reasonableVoid in tech; else if reasonableHaw. Rev. Stat. § 480-4
IdahoYes, if reasonable (statute)Yes, if reasonableUnsettledIdaho Code § 44-2701
IllinoisYes, above wage thresholdYes, above wage thresholdYes, if reasonable820 ILCS 90/10
IndianaYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableHeraeus Medical, LLC v. Zimmer, Inc. (2019)
IowaYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableLamp v. American Prosthetics, Inc. (1986)
KansasYes (statutory safe harbor)Yes (statutory safe harbor)Yes (statutory safe harbor)Kan. SB 241
KentuckyYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledCharles T. Creech, Inc. v. Brown (2014)
LouisianaVery limitedRarely (trade-secret only)Yes, if reasonableLa. R.S. 23:921
MaineYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettled26 M.R.S. § 599-A
MarylandYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledHolloway v. Faw, Casson & Co. (1989)
MassachusettsYesYes, if reasonableUnsettledM.G.L. c. 149, § 24L
MichiganYes, if reasonable (statute)Yes, if reasonableUnsettledMCL 445.774a
MinnesotaYesYes, if reasonableUnsettledMinn. Stat. § 181.988
MississippiYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledEmpiregas, Inc. of Kosciusko v. Bain (1992)
MissouriYes (statute)Yes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableMo. Rev. Stat. § 431.202
MontanaVery limitedRarely (trade-secret only)UnsettledMont. Code Ann. § 28-2-703
NebraskaYes, if reasonable (blue-pencil)Yes, if reasonableUnsettledPolly v. Ray D. Hilderman & Co. (1987)
NevadaYes, with statutory limitsYes, if reasonableUnsettledNRS 613.195
New HampshireYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableConcord Orthopaedics Prof'l Ass'n v. Forbes (1997)
New JerseyYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableSolari Industries, Inc. v. Malady (1970)
New MexicoYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledBowen v. Carlsbad Ins. & Real Estate, Inc. (1986)
New YorkYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledBDO Seidman v. Hirshberg (1999)
North CarolinaYes, if reasonable (blue-pencil)Yes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnited Laboratories, Inc. v. Kuykendall (1988)
North DakotaVery limitedYes, if reasonableLikely voidN.D. Cent. Code § 9-08-06
OhioYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledRaimonde v. Van Vlerah (1975)
OklahomaLimited by statuteYes, if reasonableUnsettled15 O.S. § 219A
OregonYes (outside noncompete statute)Yes, if reasonableUnsettledORS 653.295
PennsylvaniaYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableHess v. Gebhard & Co. (2002)
Rhode IslandYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableDurapin, Inc. v. American Products, Inc. (1989)
South CarolinaYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableRental Uniform Serv. of Florence, Inc. v. Dudley (1983)
South DakotaYes (statute), up to 2 yearsYes, if reasonableUnsettledSDCL 53-9-11
TennesseeYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledHasty v. Rent-A-Driver, Inc. (1984)
TexasYes, if reasonable (statute)Yes, if reasonableUnsettledTex. Bus. & Com. Code 15.50
UtahYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableUnsettledUtah Code 34-51-102
VermontYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableSystems & Software, Inc. v. Barnes (2005)
VirginiaYesYes, if reasonableUnsettledVa. Code 40.1-28.7:8
WashingtonYesYes, if reasonableUnsettledRCW 49.62.010
West VirginiaYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableReddy v. Community Health Foundation of Man (1982)
WisconsinYes, if reasonably necessaryYes, if reasonableUnsettledManitowoc Co. v. Lanning (2018)
WyomingYes, if reasonable (blue-pencil)Yes, if reasonableYes, if reasonableHopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc. (1993)
Washington D.C.YesYes, if reasonableUnsettledD.C. Code 32-581.01

Your non-solicitation in 3 steps

1

Pick scope & state

Customers, staff, or both, and your state; we load the relevant form.

2

Answer simple questions

Define who's protected, for how long, and the terms.

3

Sign it

Download as PDF or Word and sign under your state's rules.

Honest by design

Honest documents, honest pricing

Most form sites hook you with "free," then spring an auto-renewing subscription. We don't.

🔓

No auto-renew traps

Cancel in one click, anytime. We email you before any renewal. What you pay is what you saw.

⚖️

State-specific & reviewed

Every template is matched to your state's law and reviewed by our legal team, with citations you can check.

🔄

Kept current

When a state's rules change, we update the form. Your documents stay compliant, not stale.

Non-Solicitation FAQ

What's the difference between a non-solicitation and a non-compete?+
A non-compete bars someone from working in your field or for a competitor. A non-solicitation only bars them from poaching your clients or employees. Non-solicitation is narrower, less restrictive, and generally easier to enforce.
Are non-solicitation agreements enforceable?+
Often, the answer is yes. They're more enforceable than non-competes if the duration, scope, and definition of who's protected are reasonable and there was consideration. But it varies by state; some, like California, sharply limit or void them, so use a state-specific form.
How long should a non-solicitation last?+
Long enough to protect legitimate interests but no longer. They commonly range from six months to two years, depending on the industry and state. A period that's clearly excessive invites a court to strike or narrow it. For example, if you're developing a new product and in two years, you'll be on the 3rd generation, the non-solicitation agreement couldn't cover 5 years.
Do I need to give an existing employee something for signing?+
Usually yes. For a new promise from a current employee to be enforceable, most states require consideration. That could be a raise, promotion, bonus, or continued employment where that qualifies. A new hire's job offer itself is typically enough. As you may have noticed, this is similar to a non-compete.
Can a non-solicitation protect my employees, not just customers?+
Yes. A non-solicitation can bar a departing person from recruiting your staff ('no-poach' of employees) as well as your customers. You can include one or both, as long as each is defined and reasonable.

Create your non-solicitation agreement now

Answer a few questions and get a clean, state-specific non-solicitation agreement that protects your clients and team.

Get started →